Expand mobile version menu

Real-Life Activities

Real-Life Communication

You have been asked to be an expert witness in a court case. A songwriter is being sued for stealing material from another songwriter. You have to help prove that the work of the defendant is not related to that of the other songwriter.

Gerald Eskelin has defended a few big-name clients in such cases, including Michael Jackson, the Spin Doctors and Stevie Wonder.

He believes that in order to succeed as an expert witness, "one obviously must present a pleasant and believable image, must be able to think and write logically and clearly, and must understand very well how music works."

Here are your notes:

You have studied the arrangements and noted that there are more differences than similarities in the two pieces.

The style of the song is very common to other songs written by the defendant, and not similar to the style of the plaintiff.

The timing in the song is similar to the defendant's usual style, and not to the plaintiff's style.

Here is what the defense lawyer asks you:

Would you say that the song written by the defendant and the song written by the plaintiff are similar?

Is the style of this song similar to the defendant or plaintiff? Why?

How do you answer?

Contact

  • Email Support
  • 1-800-GO-TO-XAP (1-800-468-6927)
    From outside the U.S., please call +1 (424) 750-3900
  • North Dakota Career Resource Network
    ndcrn@nd.gov | (701) 328-9733

Support